so so didnt get what she asked for but still gets a load of pauls cash .
http//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080317/ap_en_ce/mccartney_divorce;_ylt=Ahsi8DVxC26Hs9GbvQf0S.1xFb8C
I would think Paul can live with that.
Sounds reasonable to me. I never believed she deserved half of the astronomical amounts being discussed before so this is fair - and some of it was basically her assets anyway.
Good - Britain was starting to get a bad reputation for being an easy touch and divorce-court central.
I think he got off light, it could have been a lot, lot worse.
Yeah but even the judge said negative things about Heather so she's her own worst enemy and probably cost herself some money.
Good - I don't believe anyone should profit from divorce. Fair division by all means but anything beyond that is pure greed.
I don't why she thought she'd get lots. Shouldn't she only be entitled to the money they made together while married?
I don't why she thought she'd get lots. Shouldn't she only be entitled to the money they made together while married?
I've always thought that is just common sense but apparently it's not.
Yeah but remember, she help him rebuild his career, write songs and rebuild his fortune. -)
Deluded fool that she is.
And she's employed that terrier Gloria Allred, you know the one, bangs on about women's rights and such. Apparently she's the most vilified woman in UK. The ex that is.
Mind I think she didn't get enough. Paul is still as penny pinching and mean as he always was.
Mind I think she didn't get enough. Paul is still as penny pinching and mean as he always was.
Based upon what?
She got waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more than she deserved IMO - the daughter should have got most ofany settlement as it is she who needs it more than hop a long........her outrageous demands (£39kpa for wine - yet she doesn't drink - ask your friends to bring a bottle luv!) and horse riding (again this she doesn't do!)
Judge really did lay into here, and good for him.
You are right she is not the most popular woman in the UK........she has paraded herself in public throughout this whole case and made herself out to be the victim whilst Paul (much as I don't like him or his music either) has maintained a dignified (and IMO) appropriate silence.......
His lawyer should sue here for £24.4m for throwing water over her in court - that would be too funny lol