This is England.
A combination of the 'elected dictatorship' and the supremacy of parliament means that they can do pretty much what they please.
How do you propose closing such accounts?
If you go on long enough, most of the bank's reserves could be in dormant accounts, with no resolution on who owns it. Better that it went to a good cause than let the bank use it for reserves.
But if you ever go back you'll be furious that you have to start from scratch with an account. It's much harder than it used to be.
But if you ever go back you'll be furious that you have to start from scratch with an account. It's much harder than it used to be.
Every year ask for a summary or put a token $ or withdraw some in that should keep it active.
While the socially responsible side agrees this is true, the cynical side wonders what administation will have to be set up to do this, and how much of the money will therefore go into some sort of fat cat board members pockets for the diffiult task of dishing out somebody elses money.
While the socially responsible side agrees this is true, the cynical side wonders what administation will have to be set up to do this, and how much of the money will therefore go into some sort of fat cat board members pockets for the diffiult task of dishing out somebody elses money.
not to mention what might be defined as a 'good cause'.
time to replace Trident everybody?