British Expatriate Network

Full Version: Conservapedia
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

I believe it's intented to be serious, but really it's just too funny! :lol:

Apparently, their editors could do with a little training:

Patriot Act entry Wrote:
This article has been identified as having problems with length, content and/or style, and is therefore classified as a Very Short Article (VSA). You can and are encouraged to make this article better by contributing. Please add factual and verifiable content, edit phrases to make them non problematic, or make this article more grammatically correct. Please remember to abide by The Conservapedia Commandments in your actions, though.

The Patriot Act (formally, the `Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001') was an act passed by the Republican congress following the 2001 attacks on World Trade Center. It removed a certain number of liberties from American citizens, including such things as the right of habeas corpus and the requirement for a search warrent, since of course freedom might be used by terrorists against America, and hence freedom is the enemy of security.

Long ago patriots said things like "Give me liberty, or give me death", but today we say "take away my liberties, that's ok, patriotism means security not liberty."

The Patriot Act seems to indicate that safety holds a higher value than liberty, which is a very strong argument in favor of gun control, something that followers of the Patriot Act seem strangely opposed to.

It's run by a son of Phyllis Schlafly, the woman who thinks that women should stay home and have babies.

The bit on the Democratic Party is amusing.
Some conservative is putting a lot of time and effort into this. Which is a good thing.... because it means they are not doing something more harmful...
Oh and apparently the US Senate is made up of 100 members... "50 from each state"
)

Quote:
Women
From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
According to biblical literalism, women, like Men, were created by God on the 6th day of Creation, as told in The Book of Genesis. Genesis further elaborates that God took a rib from Adam, the first Man, and from it created Eve, the first woman, as a subservient companion for Adam. Also not explicitly stated in the Bible, it is obvious that, due to the manner in which Eve was created, she was Adam's wife, as God does not intend for two humans in such a union to be any other way.[Citation Needed] Eve caused sin and suffering to come into the world when she tricked Adam into eating from The Tree of Knowledge, an act directly forbidden by God Himself. Saint Paul also has much to say on the status of women in society, most memorably that women should submit to their husbands just as the church submits to God. [1] [2] [3] [4]

Some woman organizations like the National Organization of Woman disagree with the Bible and argue that they should not have to submit to their husbands, but instead should have "equal" rights.[1]

monster @ Thu 15 Mar, 2007 12:17 pm Wrote:
Also not explicitly stated in the Bible, it is obvious that, due to the manner in which Eve was created, she was Adam's wife, as God does not intend for two humans in such a union to be any other way.[Citation Needed]


I don't even know where to being with that statement.

"Nowhere is it explicitly stated in the Bible that Vegas Rudeboy should be President and ride around in a limo stuffed with cash, hookers, guns and drugs, but it is obvious, due to his manner, that God intends this to happen."

/Vote Rude
//Jaysus says so

I guess the truth had a liberal bias, so they needed their own wikipedia?

Quote:
Moon
From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Moon orbits the Earth. Unlike most planets, Earth has only one moon and it has several striking characteristics that only be described as artistic in design:

1. Throughout man's existence, the Moon has had the same size as the Sun when viewed from Earth. This creates a beautiful symmetry and permits phenomenal eclipses to occur. The odds of that symmetry occurring by chance are too small to be considered possible. That symmetry will not last forever.

2. The Moon presents the same side to Earth at all times, even though the Moon revolves around the Earth. That requires the rotation of the Moon to be timed precisely to offset the separate effects of the revolution around Earth. This has an awesome artistic or design effect without any plausible physical reason.

Skeptics sought to explain this remarkable phenomenon by saying that tidal forces on Earth caused a bulge on the Moon, thereby locking in the rotation of the Moon so that its same face always presents to the Earth. They asserted that the planet Mercury has a similar locked rotation due to gravitational forces from the sun, such that the same side of Mercury always faces the sun.

But this explanation was ultimately proven wrong.[1] Mercury does not always present the same face to the sun as claimed, and instead switches the side that it presents to the sun every full revolution. As to the Moon, the tidal forces on the Earth cannot account fully for its bulge or egg shape. The cause of the bulge on the Moon to lock in its rotation remains a mystery to those who reject design.

3. The Moon's surface lacks the abundant iron that permeates the Earth, thereby proving that the Moon did not come from the Earth. This deficiency of iron on the Moon disproved the primary theory that the Moon must have originated by breaking off from the Earth. There is no plausible non-creation theory of origin for the Moon at this time.

4. The Moon is currently receding from the Earth at less than 6 inches per year. The Moon could never have been closer than about 150,000 miles or it would have been broken up by tidal forces. If the rate of recession is assumed to have averaged about 6 inches per year, the Moon's present distance of about 250,000 miles implies a young age for the Moon of no more than one billion years. Under the non-creationist claim that the Moon somehow broke away from the Earth, the Moon's rate of recession must have been faster in the past, and thus the Moon would have been only 150,000 miles from the Earth far more recently than one billion years ago. This contradicts the claim of non-creationists that the Moon and Earth are somehow several billions of years old.

5. Our solar system is one of the few that has only one sun. Only one sun and only one moon: this uniqueness may reflect the existence of only one God.

Minors under 16 years use this site.

* Posting of obscenity here is punishable by up to 10 years in jail under 18 USC § 1470.
* Vandalism is punishable up to 10 years in jail per 18 USC § 1030. We will trace your IP address and give it to authorities if necessary.



Tsk. Surely this site is just a big joke? I also noticed that Faux news has some sort of 1/2 hour newshour show that is trying to compete with the Daily Show.
There you go. Only one sun and one moon proves that God exists. Duh
dont know if it is intended as a joke but it comes across as such , fact wrong etc .

Its set up same format as wikipedia which it constantly knocks .IMO dont see wikipedia as a political tool .

many sites you find are extremly bias to either the left of right ( move on.com )
example of left bias ... this one example of bias to the right .
and most of them twist, leave out, or mislead on facts when it doesnt suit there criteria .
like all sites on the WWW you can make what you want of it ..
in this case not very much ... smile
Reference URL's