09-17-2006, 04:22 AM
A while ago (years now) we discussed the fact that as John Kerry has "presidential hair" he should have swept the 2004 election. But for some odd reason he didn't. My only conclusion is that he's wearing a wig because hair is more powerful than any other attribute in politics. If that was his hair he should have won 49-1. Anyhoo, I just read this article on bad (and I do mean bad) hair in politics. I thought you'd like it too.
http://www.radaronline.com/features/2006..._domes.php
"In anticipation of the Great Hair-Off of November 2006, Radar examined all 535 congressional do's to identify the eight most puzzling and potentially dooming hair trends in Washington. Granted, we could be wrong. It may be politically savvy to compulsively separate one's bangs into tiny spikes of control freakiness or walk around with random hair clumps cantilevered off one's skull. But somehow we don't think so."
See, the American government has been infiltrated by reptilian-alien beings.
http://www.radaronline.com/features/2006..._domes.php
"In anticipation of the Great Hair-Off of November 2006, Radar examined all 535 congressional do's to identify the eight most puzzling and potentially dooming hair trends in Washington. Granted, we could be wrong. It may be politically savvy to compulsively separate one's bangs into tiny spikes of control freakiness or walk around with random hair clumps cantilevered off one's skull. But somehow we don't think so."
See, the American government has been infiltrated by reptilian-alien beings.