British Expatriate Network

Full Version: HOT NEWS Canadian govt falls
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
By ROB GILLIES, Associated Press Writer 26 minutes ago

TORONTO - A corruption scandal forced a vote of no-confidence Monday that toppled
Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority government, triggering an unusual election campaign during the Christmas holidays.


Canada's three opposition parties, which control a majority in Parliament, voted against Martin's government, claiming his Liberal Party no longer has the moral authority to lead the nation.

The loss means an election for all 308 seats in the lower House of Commons, likely on Jan. 23. Martin and his Cabinet would continue to govern until then.

Opposition leaders last week called for the no-confidence vote after Martin rejected their demands to dissolve Parliament in January and hold early elections in February. Monday's vote follows a flurry of spending announcements in Ottawa last week, with the government trying to advance its agenda ahead of its demise.

Martin is expected to dissolve the House of Commons on Tuesday.

The Conservative Party leader Stephen Harper joined with the New Democratic and Bloc Quebecois parties to bring down the government — prompting the first Christmas and winter campaign in mostly Christian Canada in 26 years. Recent polls have given the Liberals a slight lead over the Conservatives, with the New Democrats in third place.

The same surveys suggest the Bloc Quebecois would sweep the French-speaking province of Quebec, making a majority government unlikely no matter which party wins the most seats.

Harper would become prime minister if the Conservatives receive the most seats in Parliament. He favors tax cuts and opposed Martin's successful bill to legalize same-sex marriage throughout Canada.

The opposition is banking on the public's disgust with a corruption scandal involving the misuse of funds targeted for a national unity program in Quebec.

An initial investigation absolved Martin of wrongdoing, but accused senior Liberal members of taking kickbacks and misspending tens of millions of dollars in public funds.

The government ran into peril this month when it lost the support of the New Democratic Party, whose backing earlier this year helped Martin escape a previous no-confidence motion by a single vote.

New Democrat leader Jack Layton said he hadn't received enough assurances the Liberal Party would fight the increased use of private health care in Canada. Martin made the deal for support from Layton's leftist party last spring by pledging $3.6 billion in social spending and promising to delay billions in corporate tax cuts.

Martin appears prepared to take his chances with a holiday campaign and blamed his opponents for any inconvenience to the predominantly Christian electorate.

He had promised to call an election within 30 days of the release of a follow-up report on the corruption scandal. The document is expected Feb. 1, which would have meant elections in the first week of April, a time that suits Canadians better than the bitterly cold and busy holiday season.

Although no formal agreement is in place, all the parties are likely to agree to a pause in the campaign around the Christmas and New Year holidays. The campaign is expected to start Tuesday, after Parliament is dissolved.

Grace Skogstad, a political science professor at the University of Toronto, said she believes Canadians will pay little attention to the election until after the New Year, so Martin's opponents are unlikely to face a backlash for forcing a holiday campaign.

"It's going to be those last three weeks after Jan. 1 that are going to matter," said Skogstad, who believes the Liberals will win another minority government. "For the Liberals, they are going to try to put all the focus on the economy which is doing phenomenally well."

Unemployment in Canada is at a 30-year low and Canada runs a budget surplus.

Andrew Stark, a political science professor at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto, also maintained that the campaign would not be decided until the final days. Stark, however, believed the Conservatives will win a minority government if Canadians view another Liberal and New Democrat coalition as being unaccountable with tax money.

The last time a Canadian political campaign coincided with the holiday season was in 1979, when Joe Clark's minority Conservative government was toppled just weeks before Christmas. That vote was delayed until February, however, when Pierre Trudeau and the Liberals took back Parliament.

The latest collapse comes 17 months after an election that turned a Liberal majority into a fragile minority on June 28, 2004.



Glad to see that at last canadians have lernt that america is not the * only* country that has corrupt politicans ...
And they are not ALL consevatives either
Its not that hard to find .

http//ca.fullcoverage.yahoo.com/fc/breakingca/federal_administration/
Paul Martin looked very chipper didn't he?

I realise the coalition has fallen apart, but one look at how Canada is doing and it's laughable that Stephen Harper thinks he can get in - no matter how many silly hats he wears. Canada is the leading country in the OECD right now, and looks like it will be for some time to come. When people talk about how the US is fairing much better than Western Europe they forget to look at Canada, which makes the US look like a lemonade stand. The Liberals have done wonders for Canada since 93. I'm confident that Martin can pin all of the Gomery report and Auditor-General Sheila Fraser's findings on Chretien - most Canadians I know blame Chretien and his chief of staff already anyway.

JohnA @ Mon 28 Nov, 2005 Wrote:
Glad to see that  at last canadians have lernt that america is not the  * only* country that  has corrupt politicans ...
 And they are not ALL consevatives either


Yes John, but the big difference is that we don't have to wait every 4 years in order for the people to decide who will represent them.

As to the reason for the Liberal Governments demise. Corruption wasn't the real issue it was purely the fact that the Liberals had to rely on the NDP ( Socialist Party) to stay in office. With them the Liberals had a very slim majority.

When we go to the polls in Jan ( looks like Jan 23), I don't expect much change. Canadians distrust Conservatives more than Liberals, so I wouldn't be surprised to see another Minority Liberal Government.

[quote="Glad to see that  at last canadians have lernt that america is not the  * only* country that  has corrupt politicans ...
 And they are not ALL consevatives either[/quote]



You do talk a lot of bollox sometimes John. wink

Canada's dealt with corrupt administrations and politicians since the start of its history. Their very first Prime Minister John A. MacDonald was a drunk.

In provincial politics  governments rise and fall like whore's knickers because of one scandal or another.

Contrary to what you seem to think Canadians do not have a holier-than-thou attitude about their politicians.

If anything they wonder why Americans regard their presidents with a certain amount of reverence when they treat their own prime ministers as just another bum come to fix the plumbing who can be fired at any time.

Lee @ Tue 29 Nov, 2005 2:06 pm Wrote:
Canada's dealt with corrupt administrations and politicians since the start of its history. Their very first Prime Minister John A


:shock:

Now I knew John A was old but I didn't think he was that old!  :shock:



Oh, and I would have asumed an event like this might make CNN's main headlines but I guess not. Why is it that Americans could not care less about Canada?
Canada's political system is far too complicated for Americans and besides, they are only one step away from liberal-pinko-communism so best left alone.......

mrbungle2103 @ Tue 29 Nov, 2005 Wrote:
. Why is it that Americans could not care less about Canada?


They're embarrassed that Canada has lower crime, better education and public health care system, while their country would rather invade a defenseless country while many of its citizens suffer from abject poverty or languish in its jails.

Can anyone tell me what was going on when I tuned to BBC world news last night.

They where going to each MP(?) in turn .
They nodded and it moved on to the next person but when certain people nodded everyone started cheering and shaking their hands and the it moved back on to the nods again ?
I guess they were casting their approval of the no confidence vote but why were some of them cheered and congratulated?

mrbungle2103 @ Tue 29 Nov, 2005 Wrote:
Now I knew John A was old but I didn't think he was that old! :shock:



Well actually i died and came back 3 days later (if he can do it i can :-)





Oh, and I would have asumed an event like this might make CNN's main headlines but I guess not. Why is it that Americans could not care less about Canada?



It was on fox news .

They do care;-) but by the time we have heard about jessica simpson and her break up with her husband fOR about the 5th time each day, and heard about angelina Jollies antics abroad ,and wether we should bogot arube cus some airheaded blonde went missing there , we dont have time to hear about Canada
.
The networks give the viewers what they want .....

Reference URL's