Do you think there is such a super plan to have a new world order?
I tend to lean towards the fact we cannot deal with current world issues.And to think some folks that all these cockups are all planned by some small group of people lol
geeze
Before I answer this do some research as to who is the primary shareholders of the banks from the G8 nations, dig deep enough you will find the same people. They are not in it for the money they have more than we could imagine. This book could help to you I highly recommend it.
http//www.marianland.com/jekyll.html
excuse the grammar it is late trying to get this posted so I can go to bed
Snuggles would it not be just plan common sense that the people that had most money had more influence. After all they have more money to protect their money
There is a documented international cartel of bankers whose history goes back to the days of serfdom. They are mostly of jewish descent and migrated to europe from the caucaus mountain range of southern russia when the mongols were terrorizing that part of the world.It is documented history that they finance both sides of war and the reconstruction of the countries after the war. Our national deficit is the deficit to them. To quote the grandfather of international banking mayer bauer, " I could care less for the laws if I issue the money" that may not be it word for word. They attempted a world government and it failed because of the US. The first attempt of a world government was the league of nations in 1918 after WWI but W. Wilson failed to rally support of americans. This failed so they financed "their guy" Hitler to create a war machine. His philosphies were his(hitlers) but the money to back it up came from these guys. Without their help WWII never happens, never would of been financed. Germany was in incredible debt to france and the bankers. The aftermath was incredible riches for these guys from the war(they financed both sides) and the reconstruction. Most of all they got the two things they wanted, Israel and the league of nations, opps I mean the UN. They also belong to documented "special societies" that their puppets (Blair and Bush) belong to and alot that only their own associate with. Look up the Bildenbergers, why do the worlds leaders, bankers and media heads all meet once a year behind closed doors? These are all documented facts not theory paulled out of my ass.Theory is every president that has stood up to these guys have been killed,Abe for issueing "greenbacks" shot by a mason with a questionable background, and Kennedy when he issued silverbacks backed by silver and signed into effect an executive order that demolished the FED it is unconstitional this is documented and real. Andrew Jackson had two attempts on his life both failed.Now back to facts as much as I am against the war in Iraq who did the US go to before we attacked, the UN. Get this... the worlds most powerful nation went to the UN to put up a case to attack Iraq that was all rubbish anyways. No country before has asked a "head" and pleaded a case to a outside enterprise for permission to attack. This is the model of the world government.... before we would go right in and attack forget asking.Even if we didn't ask we put a case before them,"well that is what they are there for",yes but it is a world government if they hold people accountable and dictate policy on a world wide scale.This small group of very wealthy men control and dictate policy that is fact. This is a broad short answer to your question about the new world order, or Novus Ordo Seclurum that fancy latin on your one dollar bill that translates into new world order.The pyramids 13 rows that lead up to the all seeing eye that is illumanted (illumanati) is all symbolism tied to them as is the eagle with 39 feathers(13x3) 13 leaves on a olive branch and the 13 arrows in the other talon all symbolism heres the best one if you look very very closely you can see an owl which holds some significance,on the frame that goes around the 1 in the upper right hand of the side with GW on it. Look beside the leaf closest to the frame sitting in the off angle C part of frame.There are 13 stars above the eagles head, why this fascination with 13 or is it coincendence all this symbolism. This is a rough generalization hard to get into specifics of such a broad topic.
Heres a link about the big dog of them all.
http//www.worldhistory.com/wiki/R/Rothschild-family.htm
Jeeze, snuggles, ever considered using paragraphs? Or are they a tool of the government designed to interupt our thoughts and thus render us unable to oppose them coherently?
I just get so excited. I can't help myself. Couple that with my American public school education, and there you go.
I'll take note.
How's this?
Are you saying the UN is run by jewish bankers? I though the mafia killed JFK i didn't know Coutt's had it in for him too.
shock
I just get so excited. I can't help myself. Couple that with my American public school education, and there you go.
I'll take note.
How's this?
Hmmmm.
My daughter's class are convinced that paragraphs contain exactly three sentences. I keep trying to convince them that's an average, but they won't have it, so I have to say you're still failing third grade in American public schools....... :P :P
That said, I'll take this new format over the old one any day ... A+++ for effort :mrgreen:
George Bush Snr. used to talk about a new world order, but he was really formed by the old world of the world wars, the cold war and the UN and NATO.
George Bush Jnr - or more accurately the Republican architects around him are carving out a new world order, but never call it that.
Without specifically getting into the debate about Iraq, Bush set the agenda with his axis of evil speech - you're either with us or against us. His strong-willed attitude to foreign policy and his simplified statements about democracy may not be to everyone's taste, but it is changing the world.
The new world order includes forcing the UN to reform or be marginalised. It is gradually replacing a NATO gazing from Brussels in bewilderment at the lack of an iiron curtain and turning attention to the Middle East and Asia.
Even the BBC recognises this by closing down many of the eastern European radio language services while preparing to launch a TV news network in Arabic to compete with Al-Jazeera,
Whether you agree with what the U.S has done or not, the relationship between the Palestinians and the Israelis is profoundly changing because of U.S pressure on both sides but mostly the Palestinians and this started long before Arafat's death.
I don't think, for instance any future Democrat president is going to support putting the UN back at the front and centre of global relations and arbitration, no matter what he or she may say. It may be well-meaning but it is corrupt to the core and almost everone knows it, but Bush was the first to be so impolite as to point this out.
This will also, I think be a profoundly anti-American century, as much as the last one was relatively pro-American. In Iraq, I fear Bush has unleashed (as 9/11 my have before) a clash of civilizations.
But I also think the new world order will entail fighting back at the United States over climate change, social inequality and unfair trade practices. This has got to be the century when Africa's needs must come the fore.
Aside from U.S policy, the new world order will increasingly be one dominated by China and India, with Europe becoming more marginalised despite the apparent economic might of the EU.