10-15-2005, 05:15 PM
The UK pro-hunting brigade had another appeal overturned during the week after challenging the validity of the Parliament Act. I don't actually feel that strongly either way on the subject but I am interested to find out whether the ban has had the massive detrimental effect that it was predicted to do on the countryside way of life.
Also anyone know whether hunts are carrying on regardless of the law? As far as I could see the law was rife with ambiguity which is why the House of Lords didn't support it. For instance I think going out with two dogs isn't against the law and therefore you could have a number of people each with two dogs. Also its not breaking the law if your pack of dogs caught a fox "by accident". Lastly, what happens if your three pet dogs chase and catch a squirrel; are you breaking the law?
The pro-hunters legal team were really clutching at straws by challenging the Parliament Act but I think that they have a real chance with the next appeal which will be under European human rights laws.
Also anyone know whether hunts are carrying on regardless of the law? As far as I could see the law was rife with ambiguity which is why the House of Lords didn't support it. For instance I think going out with two dogs isn't against the law and therefore you could have a number of people each with two dogs. Also its not breaking the law if your pack of dogs caught a fox "by accident". Lastly, what happens if your three pet dogs chase and catch a squirrel; are you breaking the law?
The pro-hunters legal team were really clutching at straws by challenging the Parliament Act but I think that they have a real chance with the next appeal which will be under European human rights laws.