So these spats flare up from time to time in real life too. If people want to argue it’s hard to stop them. How about a 'peace process' started by the mods on neutral ground?
- ‘Cease fire’ of personal abuse for the duration of talks
- A Reconciliation Hearing where the aggrieved parties can list every injustice suffered in other forums
Up for negotiation could be
- Avatar reform - usage & ownership rights
It will be entertaining at least…and keep the other threads clean. ?
I can honestly say I have no idea who the argument is between. A bit thick me. roll
So these spats flare up from time to time in real life too. If people want to argue it’s hard to stop them. How about a 'peace process' started by the mods on neutral ground?
- ‘Cease fire’ of personal abuse for the duration of talks
- A Reconciliation Hearing where the aggrieved parties can list every injustice suffered in other forums
U:
dont agree there i dont want to have to listen to someone whinning about what was said to them on another forum . this chatroom IMO anyway is for folks with a common background to share ideas , discuss topics of interest, have fun rejoice in anothers success / marriege / new baby etc . and generally hang out .
And then who is to judge if what was said was unfair , cruel , justified , nasty etc im sure if we dont hear Both sides completly we cant judge ..i would not wont to anyway .. and if we heard it all it would turn this forum into a TV court drama .
MHO is keep you personal conplaints , about others to yourself and then if you wish in private PMs or to a mod , i dont want to listen to contant whinning ......life is to short and there are many many more important thingd in life to solve then somebodys grievance againt whata another poster wrote ,
WITH the caviat, if it is here inprint and we all have to wade thought it to get to the next thread then we might have a few words to say to the combatants .
I can honestly say I have no idea who the argument is between. A bit thick me. :roll:
me neither, but I am just trying to find something else to do but work!!
I can honestly say I have no idea who the argument is between. A bit thick me. :roll:
Ditto.
However, I will be honest enough to admit I left another board, immigration related, due to all the infighting and slanging matches. Gets on my tits something chronic!
There, I feel much better now I've said that! :razz:
no, but "allowed" is a bit of a vague word.
People shouldn't be allowed to abuse children either.
.
"Abuse" is also a bit vauge and so is "children".
Yes, Nigel really said that. So, if someone wants to post something that makes themselves look like a complete arsehole for the rest of eternity - post forth.
Also, I do have the total right to remove any post or person that I want to.
The 1st amendment limits Congress as far as censorship goes, not private individuals.
Regards
Nigel
no, but "allowed" is a bit of a vague word.
People shouldn't be allowed to abuse children either.
.
"Abuse" is also a bit vauge and so is "children".
hurrah! you got the point! :roll: